The Fizz! Blog

My customer hasn’t paid their invoice - what can I do?

Understandably, many freelancers and other small business owners are reluctant to chase payment of invoices - they fear that it might cause problems in their relationship with the client.  In honesty, we think that fear is almost always misplaced - businesses that don’t pay invoices on time generally see that as part of the general cut-and-thrust of commercial life, and are likely to think that chasing them is a perfectly reasonable thing for you to be doing!

But if you’re still not comfortable doing it, there are a couple of other routes you could consider in order to depersonalise things.  You can fire reminders out of your accounts software (we’ll discuss statements of account shortly), rather than sending them personally (Xero even has the facility to send payment reminders automatically when an invoice becomes overdue - though if you do that, you need to make sure you keep everything up to date, lest Xero remind someone who has already paid!).  Or (/and) you could create a separate email address for your “accounts department” and have financial stuff go through another account entirely.

Broadly, businesses tend to pay invoices based on one of three triggers:

• The invoice (either paying it immediately or in some sort of scheduled pay run).  In an ideal world, you only have this type of customer!  Obviously the important thing with these customers is just to get an accurate invoice out on time to the right person.  If you’re dealing regularly with repeat customers, you might also consider getting something in place to just collect money from them automatically without their needing to lift a finger.  We use GoCardless for 95% of our invoices; it collects them automatically by direct debit on the due date and does the Xero reconciliation of the payments for us, saving time and effort all round.
• A statement of account.  This is a periodic (usually monthly) document summarising what a customer owes at a given point in time.  Big businesses are very used to issuing and receiving them.  They’re very easy to generate and send out via any mainstream accounting software.  If you have multiple customers owing you money at any point in time, you might want to just diarise sending out statements of account every month to anyone with an overdue invoice (we do), as this will quite often prompt payment of a forgotten invoice, or a request for a duplicate of one that’s gone astray.
• A legal threat!  It’s actually obviously highly unusual for that to be someone’s literal trigger, though we have been aware of a couple of local businesses over the years who routinely wouldn’t pay a bill until they got a threat of legal action.  Again, for them it just seemed to be part of the game of business.  Fortunately we were not amongst their suppliers!   We have seen clients have success getting payment of overdue invoices simply via a lawyer’s letter, either from a low-cost online provider like Thomas Higgins, or a firm they have a broader relationship with.  Of course, we’ve also seen clients who’ve had to go further down the legal process.

Something else to consider - if an invoice is paid late, you’re entitled to charge interest.  This is another thing that businesses are understandably reluctant to do - but which in reality we’ve never seen cause a problem.  Another part of the game for late payers.

The Small Business Commissioner has some more useful suggestions about how you might go about making sure invoices to your customer are received, processed and paid properly.  Try to get past any reluctance to assert yourself, especially once invoices are actually late - from that point, most customers will genuinely recognise you’re just doing your job!

www.fizzhq.com

Why you should raise sales invoices on your accounting software

It’s very surprising how many businesses don’t create their sales invoices on their accounting software. It’s far from uncommon to take on a client and find they create sales invoices elsewhere, send them out, and track whether or not they’ve been paid using either a spreadsheet - or even via some more informal system. This is a shame, for a few reasons:

• It doesn’t save any work at all - it probably creates more work, as a VAT registered business is going to have to recreate the invoice in its accounting software anyway.
  It could mean confusion. They might send out an invoice, amend the invoice, and give the old invoice to their accountant for accounts or VAT prep, meaning there’s work to be done to figure out why the amounts coming into the bank don’t match what’s being paid.
  As a worst case scenario, it could mean they lose out financially. For example, they might send out an invoice, forget to track it, never be paid, and never notice.

If the invoice is created in accounting software in the first place, and emailed out from there, there’s one unambiguous source of truth about how much the invoice is for (if you amend it, you’ll amend it in the software), and one unambiguous source of truth about whether it’s been paid or not - amounts coming into the business bank account must be logged against the invoices they’re settling, so if everything’s up to date you can generate a list of outstanding invoices at the click of a button.

The most common objection to generating invoices using accounting software - particularly amongst businesses in creative industries - is that they won’t look precisely as the business would like them to look. That’s true - but they really do look fine, and are quite customisable, and you’ll also know for sure that they include everything that’s legally mandated to appear on an invoice. Businesses are very used to receiving invoices generated from all the major accounting platforms and are unlikely to judge the appearance of a Xero or FreeAgent invoice with your logo on harshly. Ultimately, the important thing about an invoice is that it gets paid!

www.fizzhq.com

It's party time! Tax at Christmas 2022

After a party-free 2020 and a party-light 2021 perhaps it's going to be a party hard 2022!  If you're hoping to get the party started, here's a reminder about the tax rules around work Christmas parties and gifts.

If an employer provides a Christmas party that's available to all of its staff (note that this really applies to PAYE employees, as opposed to, say, freelancers), where the cost is less than £150 per head, then it can reclaim all of the VAT and deduct the entire remaining cost from its profits before working out its tax bill - effectively, if a normal VAT-registered limited company holds its party at a normal VAT-registered venue, every £100 spent on the party ends up costing the company £67 in the long run, once they've got the VAT back and saved corporation tax on what's left.  Actually, those allowances apply to annual events, not specifically Christmas ones - so you could have, say, a summer barbecue *and* a Christmas party costing less than £150 a head in total and still reclaim all of the VAT and get tax relief on the balance.

If you want to give a Christmas gift to staff, then in practice HMRC consider a relatively small item like a turkey or a fairly normal bottle of wine to be trivial, and won't try to tax the employee on the value of the gift (as we've written before, sporadic gifts and benefits each valued at £50 or less are explicitly considered trivial by HMRC). Assuming there's VAT on the gift when you buy it, then once more the ultimate cost of £100 of staff gifts to a normal VAT-registered limited company employer will be £67. Anything more valuable the employees will have to pay tax on - and you'll have to pay National Insurance too.

If you give gifts to customers, then they'll only save you tax in full if:

• The total value of gifts in a year to the customer is less than £50,
• The gift has a clear advert for your business on it, and
• You can't eat, drink or smoke it!

If you want to give a customer, say, a bottle of whisky then that's still completely fine, and may well make great business sense! But a) you can only claim the VAT back on the gift if it costs less than £50 and b) you won't save corporation tax on it however much it costs. So a £49 bottle will cost a company £41 in the end (it can get the VAT back but can't save any corporation tax) and a £100 bottle will cost it £100 - it can't reclaim any VAT or reduce your corporation tax or income tax bill at all.

www.fizzhq.com

Should my company buy stuff before 31 March 2023, or after?

At present, companies buying plant and machinery (computers, machinery, furniture, vans, that kind of thing - not cars, though) can claim the Super-deduction.  This means that for every £1 they spend, they save tax as if they’ve spent £1.30.  Since corporation tax is currently 19%, this means they effectively save tax at 24.7% on those purchases this year.

This was put in place because corporation tax is going up in April 2023, and if nothing was done then companies would have deferred those purchases until then.  The Super-deduction was designed to put companies in a broadly similar position whenever they bought stuff, so as not to discourage investment.

So, with corporation tax going up in April, and the Super-deduction being withdrawn, does that mean it’s not worth thinking about when you buy new assets?  Not necessarily!  There are actually going to be three corporation tax rates in place:

• Companies with profits under £50,000 will still pay tax at 19%.  If you know your company will have profits of less than £50,000 each year, you should invest before the end of March.  You’re effectively saving 24.7% this year, not 19% next year, a big saving.
• Companies with profits over £250,000 will pay tax at 25%. If you know your company will have profits of more than £250,000 each year, it doesn’t really matter when you invest.  A 24.7% tax deduction this year and a 25% tax deduction a year later are more or less the same.
• Profits in between £50,000 and £250,000 will effectively be taxed at 26.5% - a “catch up” rate to go from 19% to 25%.  If you know a purchase will reduce your profits from less than £250,000 to more than £50,000, arguably you might want to wait until next year to invest, as saving 26.5% is better than saving 24.7%.  But it’s only a bit better, so you might as well just buy whatever it is as soon as it’ll be useful to you!

(Things are a bit more nuanced for companies that don't have a 31 March year-end, who won't get the full 130% deduction - but they'll still get more than 100%).

Of course, you should never buy anything solely to save tax!  You buy things to ultimately pay MORE tax, not less.  But if you’re going to buy something, the good news is that you’re not going to go far wrong by just getting it as soon as your company needs it.

www.fizzhq.com

MTD for Landlords - what do you need to know?

UPDATE, DECEMBER 2022:  Nothing!  This initiative has now been postponed until (at least) 2026, and only landlords with revenue (initially) of £50,000 a year will now be affected.  But, here's what we said back in October anyway...

The government has a long-standing drive to make us report income to them a) digitally and b) more frequently - “Making Tax Digital”.  The initial phases of this forced all VAT registered businesses to submit their quarterly VAT returns online, with an unbroken link between the return and the source records.  This has basically worked well.  For businesses used to keeping paper or spreadsheet records, the jump they probably made to accounting software will have involved a bit of work, but most businesses were using software anyway, and many of those that weren’t have found life better with it.

The next phase will be a bit less smooth.  Making Tax Digital for Income Tax is going to force all sole traders and landlords with revenue of over £10,000 a year to make quarterly reports of their income and costs to HMRC, from April 2024 (partnerships won’t be brought in until 2025).  This won’t (for the time being, anyway) affect the calculation of annual profits, or the timetable for payment of tax, it’s just to give HMRC more timely in-year information to analyse.  Many or most of the sole traders will be using software already, so more regular reporting shouldn’t be too much of a burden for them.  Virtually none of the landlords will.

For smaller landlords - those with gross rents below £85,000 - the minimum required report will be rather simple; total revenue and total costs.  Not really enough for HMRC to do much analysis of.  Larger landlords will be required to file costs in more detailed categories.  99% (at least) of individual landlords are going to fall into the former category though; there aren’t many with rents of over £85,000 a year.

If you have gross rents under £10,000 a year, you don’t have to do anything in the first instance.  But if your revenue goes over that level, quarterly digital reporting becomes compulsory - and you can’t come out of the system unless you cease to have any such income, or it’s below £10,000 for three straight years.  Effectively, sole traders will be in until they retire, landlords will be in until they sell their properties.

It’s important to note that the £10,000 is revenue or gross rents, not profit.  So a sole trader with £12,000 of revenue and £9,000 of costs, making £3,000 of profit a year, must sign up, and so must a landlord with £13,000 of gross rents and £5,000 of costs.  And if you’ve both sole trader income *and* rental income, it’s the total that’s important.  So someone with £8,000 of sole trader revenue and a flat rented out for £500 a month must sign up - that’s £14,000 of income in total.

On the more generous side, if a couple own a rental property, then the £10,000 threshold is per owner - so if gross rents are £18,000, split 50/50, there’s no need to sign up to MTD (although, less generously, if the gross rents are £21,000, they will *both* have to make reports - a report is for a single individual).  And if you’ve income that doesn’t have to be reported on a tax return at all (like rent a room income below £7,500) then that’s disregarded entirely when deciding if you have to sign up or not (although, if you’re in for some other reason, the rent a room income *does* have to be disclosed in the MTD reports!).

One thing that on the face of it seems problematic is that owners of Furnished Holiday Lettings (FHLs) will have to make a different report in more detail - but you don’t always know if your property qualifies as an FHL until after the end of the tax year!  Presumably the suggestion will be to report as if it were an FHL.  At least owners of those properties are pretty likely to already be in the habit of keeping decent contemporary accounting records.

There will be some practical problems.  There’s supposed to be a digital link between the report you make and the underlying records.  But what if the underlying records are necessarily kept in different places?  Perhaps you own one property outright and 25% of an unconnected one with a group of other owners.  You’re going to have to aggregate those figures somehow and then report them to HMRC.  There’s a fudge called “bridging software” that can report from Excel records, not from accounting software, and it may come into play.

So, what should you do in terms of changing your record keeping?  At the moment, probably nothing.  Previous phases of MTD were repeatedly delayed; the general feeling is that this phase of MTD is 99% likely to happen, but maybe only 50% likely to happen in 2024 as planned.  When it does happen, we’ll be helping clients set up a system that will work for them.  FreeAgent have introduced a special version of their excellent bookkeeping software just for landlords, and for portfolio landlords who could actually benefit from more advanced tracking of multiple properties there are products like Hammock.  And for very simple cases, it might be that Excel and bridging software is fine.  For now, the important thing is just to know that it’s (almost certainly) going to happen!

www.fizzhq.com

What can you claim for charging your electric company car at home?

Thanks to the incredibly generous tax rules that apply to them, the vast majority of new company cars now are electric.  Most of them are probably charged at home.  If you’re charging your electric company car at home, how much can you claim back from your employer to cover the cost?

HMRC’s guidance from the outset has been that you can claim back the cost of electricity relating to business miles but not private miles.  You could do that by trying to figure out the actual cost, but most normal people are going to use the shortcut of HMRC’s approved rate; 5p a mile (a recent increase from 4p a mile).  Using that kind of basis with an approved HMRC rate has always been the way it’s been done with traditional fuels.

However, a cat has recently been put amongst the pigeons.  The ICAEW has pointed out that, per the legislation, electricity *isn’t* fuel, so treating it as such is wrong.  It’s just one of the general costs of running the car.  That being the case, it’s legitimate for the employer to pay for *all* the electricity that goes into the car, not just the business part (just as it can pay for all the servicing, all the insurance and so on).  And at this moment, there seems to be general agreement that HMRC’s guidance on this is wrong.

There are a few things to say about this:

• We’re only talking about fairly modest amounts here!  A driver who was going to claim back 5p a mile for her 2,000 business miles but not her 8,000 private ones can now be reimbursed £500 by her employer, not just £100.  Nice, but not life-changing.
• Employers may not actually pay an employee the whole lot; in fact, they probably won’t on the whole.  Just because an employer *could* reimburse an employee for the cost of her private motoring doesn’t mean they will.  They’ll probably quite reasonably think that the employee can pay for their own life themselves.  Who is going to be reimbursed?  Company owners themselves, that’s who.  They’ll definitely claim as much as they can tax-free!
• It’s possible HMRC might be bloody minded and try to cling on to their guidance!  In any case, it’s pretty likely the government will legislate to close what’s perilously close to being a loophole - let’s be honest, electricity really is analogous to fuel in every way.

For now, though, the advice for directors with an electric company car is going to be - claim 5p a mile for all mileage from your company until HMRC slam the door again!

www.fizzhq.com

Can my limited company pay for my counselling or therapy sessions?

As ever with these questions, the "can" is a red herring that tempts a literal but unhelpful answer.  Your company can pay for anything, the real question is whether there will be knock-on tax consequences that make it a bad idea.

In this case, perhaps surprisingly, there probably aren't any adverse consequences.  The rules, HMRC's guidance about them and HMRC's internal manuals are clear - an employer can pay for counselling for employees with no tax consequences for the employee, and though HMRC say the exemption is tightly drawn it actually covers a lot of areas.

Now, this exemption is plainly not intended for owner-managed businesses.  For a big employer, claiming that they're only providing the therapy because of their needs as an employer, and that long-term personal benefit to the employee may well be created as well but it's not the reason for their footing the bill, is a reasonable assertion.  If it's your own business, then that dividing line between employer and employee is not so clear.  But HMRC are pretty unambiguous about it, so if you’re comfortable that the counselling you’re contemplating falls within HMRC's guidance as tax-free, then you should feel confident going ahead.  Your company must provide the therapy, so should contract with the therapist itself - it's no good arranging it yourself and claiming the costs back if you want the setup to be robust.

If you're a sole trader or a partner in a partnership, then this doesn't apply; these are employment tax rules.  A sole trader or partner will probably find it difficult to impossible to sustain the argument that the cost is tax-deductible - it's have to be incurred wholly and exclusively for the purpose of their trade.

www.fizzhq.com

If you’re considering whether to work as a sole trader or form a limited company, accountancy fees are a red herring

A frequent question when you’ve recommended to someone that a limited company is the route you’d advocate for them is “can I just check how much those fees would be if I worked as a sole trader instead?”.

That’s a totally understandable question, but actually should not rationally be part of the decision-making process. A conscientious adviser will already have taken that into account when giving the advice! They wouldn’t simply ignore a significant cost.

A literal answer to that question might be something like “If you were a sole trader, those fees would be £1,000 a year lower”. But that’s totally unhelpful as an answer, because the tax liabilities of a typical sole trader are going to be greater than those of a company and its owner, by at least as much, so someone with annual revenue of, say, £50,000 is going to end up in pretty much the same position either way when you take taxes AND fees into account.

You can only sensibly compare that total bundle of “all taxes plus professional fees’ down each route, not just a single component. Otherwise it’d be like deciding to work as a sole trader to avoid having to pay corporation tax, without considering that you’ll have to pay income tax and National Insurance! All of the costs and benefits need to be considered - and as tax rates stand at the moment, the relative professional fees for those two routes aren’t relevant to the decision for anyone who understands how the pieces fit together.

www.fizzhq.com

Your company doesn’t have to die just because you’ve stopped working

Often limited company owners - especially those that essentially sell their own services through the company - assume that, when they stop working, that will necessarily be the end of the life of their limited company too.  It’s easy to see why people default to believing that their personal company is tied to their own working life in that way, but it needn’t be.  It will often be appropriate to close down a company when its owners stop working, but not always.

Although owners will often use their company to channel year-on-year income to themselves, and they might consider the dividends they get this year to be “this year’s” profit, there’s no actual link between a £1 of revenue coming in and £1 of dividends going out.  Money is a fungible asset (a few years ago, it was mostly just accountants who knew what that meant, but now the concept is rather more widely known!).

It can be helpful to think of the profits in a company as being like a reservoir, where profits go in, and dividends get drawn out.  If a company is making significantly more profit than its owner is taking out in dividends, the reservoir will fill up.  Just because the owner stops working, and therefore stops filling up that reservoir, it doesn’t have to be drained immediately.  There’s no special link between the work done to create the profits and the dividends that are paid out (if you own some shares in Vodafone, you’ll get a dividend from time to time, but you’d not expect to be told it was the profit from Dave selling an iPhone last Thursday).

Sometimes it can be efficient to empty the reservoir right away!  There can be tax planning opportunities from winding up a company like that.  Equally, though, it might be appropriate to keep taking dividends for the time being - gradually emptying out that reservoir.  It could be a way of getting money out even more tax-efficiently than a liquidation, and some people might prefer the gradual, planned drawing-down of the money to one big hit of cash.

It can be hard to separate your company from yourself (especially if you’ve been working through it for a long time and it’s called Your Name Limited!).  But if you can get to the point of seeing it as a separate entity (or reservoir!) that can be very helpful.

www.fizzhq.com

The problem is often domestic consumption, not business profits

“Annual income twenty pounds, annual expenditure nineteen and six, result happiness. Annual income twenty pounds, annual expenditure twenty pounds ought and six, result misery” - Wilkins Micawber

A frequent frustration for accountants (at least, accountants like us who try to help people form a holistic view of their finances, rather than just preparing legally-mandated accounts and returns for signature) is that you generally only really get to assess and consult on 50% of a client’s position. You see the income coming into their business, you see the costs going out, and you see the profits. You’ll have conversations about how the income might be increased, or the costs decreased - or the costs increased so that the income might be increased even more, or the costs increased so that the owner’s life might become happier or more satisfying (or the income decreased so that the owner’s life might become happier or more satisfying!). You’ll see the year-end snapshot of the position of the business (i.e. its balance sheet), and talk about the liquidity of the business, its resilience to short and medium term adversity and the “runway” it has to continue stably paying its owners and workers without persistent worry about short-term cashflow. This is all really useful and important.

However, there’s a similar picture in everyone’s personal life, and you often get little or no insight into that. If an individual or household kept and assessed similar records, they could consider all those same issues, which are just as important in a domestic context - and, for a business owner, considering the interaction of the finances and their own could bring an extra layer of insight. It doesn’t matter so much if there’s little runway in a business if there's masses of it in the owner’s own life, and it doesn’t matter so much if the owner has minimal personal savings if there’s a big reservoir of profits to draw on in her business.

When there’s an incompatibility between income and outgoings, it’s actually often not between the income of a business and the outgoings of the business - it’s just as likely to be between the income of a business and the domestic outgoings of its owner! Often the owner might be fixated on relatively trivial costs in the business and trying to drive them down a bit. But a bigger question than “can I reduce the £50 a month business mobile phone contract?”, and one that would probably unlock greater revelations and behaviour changes, might be - “what’s happening with the £100,000 that’s being drawn out of the business by its owner each year?”.

Unfortunately, we don’t have much of a culture in this country of that kind of personal financial record-keeping, and there’s no outside mandate forcing anyone to do it. On top of that, people often seem to have a more fatalistic attitude about personal and household finances than business ones, and may feel that they simply can’t be materially changed. If you’re a business owner, though, it pays to think about business finances and personal finances as two sides of one coin, not two entirely separate systems.

www.fizzhq.com